โ RNS 1.4.2 released https://pypi.org/project/rns/
๐ฌค rns.recipes
top
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
โ Communicating with serial interface โ
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
Started by Necom ยท 1mo ago ยท 15c9a46c70d24d73
Page 2 of 2
< Previous [ 2 ]
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
post-11
โญโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ
โ Necom #11 โ
โ 15c9a46c70d24d73 โ
โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ
โธ 11d ago
> And having your own firmware is also a bit more satisfying in a way, isn't it?
Indeed, it is!
> And if you keep messing around with it, you can get the same kinds of speeds as well,
or even faster :)
Sounds exciting, will definitely try!
โ 0 โ 0 โค 0
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
post-12
โญโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ
โ Necom #12 โ
โ 15c9a46c70d24d73 โ
โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ
โธ 9d ago
So I did some more speed tests (and optimising which may or may not have actually
impacted the performance much at all). Before I had just been testing the speed by
refreshing a nomadnet page and seeing what speed the progress bar was showing, the
highest it ever went to was like 56Kbps. That's probably not the best way to measure the
speed so I tried Speedtest.py from the code examples. On the client side it seems a bit
broken (reporting 2.00 MiB sent at around 14 - 16 Mbps, even though the esp32s are still
shining their leds constantly indicating the data is still being sent and hasn't finished
yet), but on the server side it seems a little more reliable. With a data_cap of
1001024 I was getting around 80Kbps, at one point it went as high as 98Kbps. After
changing it to 10241024 it was reporting as high as 416Kbps. That doesn't seem quite
right to me, correct me if I'm wrong but afaIk the serial connection is 1 bit per symbol,
so at a baud rate of 115200 the interface shouldn't be able to go higher than 115.2Kbps,
no matter how fast the wi-fi is
โ 0 โ 0 โค 0
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
post-13
โญโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ
โ Necom #13 โ
โ 15c9a46c70d24d73 โ
โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ
โธ 9d ago
Wait asterisks make text italic on here? Where is that information? Haven't been able to
find any sort of guide regarding what kind of formatting the forum uses. Anyways that's
supposed to say 100 times 1024, and 1024 times 1024
โ 0 โ 0 โค 0
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
post-14
โญโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ
โ bergie #14 โ
โ f9477df559d52317 โ
โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ
โธ 9d ago
Necom wrote:
> Wait asterisks make text italic on here? Where is that information? Haven't been
able to find any sort of guide regarding what kind of formatting the forum uses.
On the web version the commenting form shows the subset of Markdown supported: bold,
italic, code etc
โ 1 โ 0 โค 0
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
post-15
โญโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ
โ Mark #15 โ
โ bc7291552be7a58f โ
โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ
โธ 9d ago
If the ESP boards you have are using the USB CDC driver, and not a USB/UART converter,
there's a good chance it doesn't actually care about the baudrate set, and may run at a
much higher rate, probably 1Mbaud. It would depend on what is configured with
make menuconfig .
โ 0 โ 0 โค 0
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
post-16
โญโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฎ
โ Necom #16 โ
โ 15c9a46c70d24d73 โ
โฐโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโฏ
โธ 8d ago
Well as I said Iโm using a pair of Heltec V3s, so theyโre using a CP2102. I donโt know
what menuconfig is, Iโve definitely read the name before but no recollection of what it
is. Iโm not using make anyways, Iโm using the graphical Arduino IDE, so to build I just
hit a button in the top left corner and it compiles the .ino. Well I guess maybe itโs
using make behind the scenes.
Even if the baud rate in the firmware didnโt matter wouldnโt the baud rate set in the
interface configuration matter? Would Reticulum just completely ignore the speed and
communicate at a Mbaud? I did try setting it to 9600 and the interface seemed to entirely
stop working cause I wasnโt receiving a response to any path or link requests, so I guess
I already answered my own question with that one. Point is as far as I can tell it
shouldnโt be higher than 115200
โ 0 โ 0 โค 0
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
< Previous [ 2 ]
Page 2 of 2
โ INFO โ Identify to this node to post. How?
bottom